Editor’s Note: On Tuesday Nov. 3, Proposition 18 failed, with 56% of voters against the proposition and 44% in favor.  

Some 17-year-olds in California may soon get the right to vote, depending on what happens with a proposition on the statewide Nov. 3 ballot. 

Proposition 18 would amend the California state Constitution to allow 17-year-olds to vote in a primary election if they will turn 18 by the next General Election or Special Election. The current voting age is 18 for all elections. 

“Amends California Constitution to Permit 17-Year-Olds to Vote in Primary and Special Elections if They Will Turn 18 by the Next General Election and be Otherwise Eligible to Vote,” states the ballot. “Legislative Constitutional Amendment.”

Shalhevet seniors who have turned 18 will be eligible to vote next month in the General Election. They did not get to vote in the March 3 primary, but they would have if this proposition had been in effect.  

Senior Akiva Rubin — who already has cast his ballot for Nov. 3 — voted yes on Prop. 18.

“Teenagers really should have a say in this country, especially now,” said Akiva, “since in the past few years a lot of teenagers have been voicing their opinion about a lot of different things in politics and kinda really starting to make a change.”

He added that he thought if a 17-year-old could join the military, he or she should be able to vote for policies.

“If you’re 17, you should be able to vote for that [primary election] as well,” said Akiva “It’s like not even a full year difference.”

Senior Kate Orlanski, who is also eligible to vote this fall, said she was still studying whether to support Prop. 18. She said that she has friends in other states where this law is in effect. 

“I don’t really see why it’s necessary,” said Kate. “I just kinda think there’s a cutoff it’s 18 — you can vote when you’re 18.” But she said she would still consider it. 

Supporters of Prop. 18 say that since these 17-year-olds will be able to vote in the General Election they should be able to participate in the Primary Election and choose who they will be voting for in the General.

English teacher Nancy Fasules said she supports the proposition but worries that 17-year-olds might just follow their parents opinions. 

Still, she thinks the proposal makes sense.

“If you’re going to be voting for a candidate because you’re old enough, you should be allowed to help choose that candidate,” Ms. Fasules said.

Shalhevet SAS Civics teacher Mr. William Reusch said he would probably support the proposition too, though he believes how informed people are should outweigh their age as a qualification. He also stressed the importance of a good civics education. 

His fear is that while being eligible younger would improve teens’ engagement — that is, their actual involvement in the democratic process — real progress requires adults preparing them to do so — something that’s not part of Prop. 18. 

“I think it would promote civic engagement, I don’t think it would promote civic education,” Mr. Reusch said. “And education is what I want. I don’t want more people voting.  Everyone says, ‘Go vote, go vote, go vote.’  It’s like no, no — go learn about the issues, then vote.” 

Mr. Reusch also said that he thought kids might buy into policies that “sound good,” and he worries that that candidates could take advantage of them.